E:HEV EX-L vs ES REEV PRO Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
4971
4945
1862
1978
1449
1485
2830
3000
573
/
/
19"
Fuel Economy
/
6.3 L/100km
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
Welcome pedal
/
✓
/
4-Way manual
Interior
Front Row Seats
Driver Seat
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
ESP
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
5 min
/
/
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
TBD
146 BHP - 204
261 HP - 473 HP
Automatic
AT
Hybrid
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
/
Hybrid
Hybrid
204
261 HP
152
195kw
6100
/
335
324Nm
4500
/
Motor
152
/
/
1
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
L2 ADAS
/
Rear & Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E:HEV EX-L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
ES REEV PRO
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Steering Adjustment
- Driving Recorder
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent fuel consumption and environmental efficiency
- Comfortable and quiet driving experience
- Luxurious and technologically equipped interior design
Negative
- Relatively high price compared to competitors
- Less dynamic response for sports driving lovers
- Slightly higher future maintenance costs
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE:HEV EX-L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E:HEV EX-L if you care more about price; choose ES REEV PRO if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E:HEV EX-L has a fuel consumption of No data, while ES REEV PRO has a fuel consumption of 15.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E:HEV EX-L has a wheelbase of 2830, while ES REEV PRO has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES REEV PRO, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E:HEV EX-L uses No data, while ES REEV PRO uses Rear Drive.