E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
217 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4746 mm
4341 mm
2070 mm
1804 mm
1664 mm
1693 mm
2874 mm
2676 mm
650 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
63 L
50 L
13.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
246 BHP - 550 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
246 BHP
115 BHP
365 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.