CarteaCompare CarsE Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum Comparison

Car Information

/

6.0

/

Engine / Motor

217 km/h

190

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

4746 mm

5.636

2070 mm

2.029

1664 mm

1.941

2874 mm

3.343

650 L

592

/

Fuel Economy

13.5 Km/L

8.1

63 L

107

13.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 5.0 L

3.5 L - 5.4 L

246 BHP - 550 BHP

300 BHP - 440

Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

6 Seater - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

246 BHP

400 BHP

365 Nm

650

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jaguar | E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Audi | Q5 Sportback 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Jaguar | E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Nissan | PATROL SE Titanium

Jaguar | E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XTS 2018 3.6L V-Sport Platinum

Jaguar | E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Volkswagen | Touareg R-Line 3.0L

Jaguar | E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum has a wheelbase of 3.343. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E Pace 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum uses All Wheel Drive.