E300 3.0L vs Hino 300 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
/
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
3
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
4,765
1880 mm
1,880
1480 mm
2,200
2961 mm
3,430
540 L
/
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
6.6 km/L
66 L
/
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
6-speed Manual transmission
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
4.0 L
204 BHP - 402
147
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
6-speed Manual transmission
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Diesel
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
3
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
147
420 Nm
420
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Hino 300
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHino 300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Hino 300 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Hino 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, E300 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while Hino 300 has a wheelbase of 3,430. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hino 300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Hino 300 uses No data.