E300 3.0L vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
260 km/h
4
4
2998 cc
1998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4949 mm
4665 mm
1880 mm
1810 mm
1480 mm
1430 mm
2961 mm
2800 mm
540 L
480 L
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
13 Km/L
66 L
66 L
9 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
204 BHP - 285 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
285 BHP
241 BHP
420 Nm
350 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS 300 Premier 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 3.0L if you care more about interior space; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.