E300 3.0L vs Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
250
4
8
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
5295
1880 mm
1905
1480 mm
1499
2961 mm
3165
540 L
530
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
11.2
66 L
80
9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
4.0 L
204 BHP - 402
601 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
612 BHP
420 Nm
900
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 3.0L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3165. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG 2023 4.0L 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.