EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

161 km/h

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

3999 mm

4341 mm

1765 mm

1804 mm

1708 mm

1693 mm

2520 mm

2676 mm

346 L

414 L

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

17.2 Km/L

52 L

50 L

14.7 Km/L

17.2 Km/L

Safety

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

120 BHP

105 BHP - 135 BHP

TBD

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

120 BHP

115 BHP

151 Nm

156 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

    • ABS
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

VS

Dongfeng | AX7 E1

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente has a wheelbase of 2520 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.