EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3999 mm
4.275
1765 mm
1.765
1708 mm
1.535
2520 mm
2.570
346 L
240
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
15.4
52 L
48
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
120 BHP
148 BHP
151 Nm
192
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2000 L
/
147 BHP - 148 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Motor
/
N/A
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente
- ABS
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente has a wheelbase of 2520 mm, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EcoSport 1.5 Ambiente uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.