EcoSport 1.5 Trend vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
3998 mm
4341 mm
1765 mm
1804 mm
1645 mm
1693 mm
2521 mm
2676 mm
346 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
16.4 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
52 L
50 L
16.4 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
120 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
120 BHP
115 BHP
151 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
EcoSport 1.5 Trend
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.