CarteaCompare CarsEcoSport 1.5 Trend vs GS3 1.3T GB

EcoSport 1.5 Trend vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

3998 mm

4350 mm

1765 mm

1825 mm

1645 mm

1680 mm

2521 mm

2560 mm

346 L

370 L

Fuel Economy

16.4 Km/L

13.3 Km/L

52 L

50 L

16.4 Km/L

13.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

Safety

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

120 BHP

172 BHP - 202 BHP

TBD

7DCT & Automatic & DCT

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

Engine

1.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

120 BHP

202 BHP

151 Nm

137 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EcoSport 1.5 Trend

    • ABS
  • GS3 1.3T GB

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price; choose GS3 1.3T GB if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Trend

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Trend

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Trend

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Trend

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

Ford | EcoSport 1.5 Trend

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while GS3 1.3T GB has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while GS3 1.3T GB has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS3 1.3T GB, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS3 1.3T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.