EcoSport 1.5 Trend vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
3998 mm
5004 mm
1765 mm
1978 mm
1645 mm
1802 mm
2521 mm
2900 mm
346 L
470 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
16.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
52 L
74 L
16.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
120 BHP
250 BHP - 271 BHP
TBD
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
120 BHP
271 BHP
151 Nm
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
EcoSport 1.5 Trend
- ABS
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.