CarteaCompare CarsEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters vs AT4

EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters vs AT4 Comparison

Car Information

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

/

Engine / Motor

N/A, Electric

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

8

5209

/

2010

/

1731

/

3110

/

/

20"

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

10

/

AMPLIFIER

Transmission

Automatic

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC

/

MECHANICAL

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

/

MAGNETIC RIDE CONTROL SUSPENSION

/

AIR RIDE ADAPTIVE SUSPENSION

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

429 BHP - 543 BHP

320 BHP - 420 BHP

Automatic

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

320 km - 515 km

/

4 Seater - 7 Seater

7 - 9 Seater

/

5.3 L - 6.2 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

HIGH APPROACH ANGLE BUMPER

Engine

0.0 L

5.3L

Electric

Gasoline

429 BHP

355HP

600

518 NM

/

V

/

ECOTEC3 V8

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • AT4

    • Power Tailgate
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing capabilities
  • Advanced entertainment systems

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Their price is relatively high
  • Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about price; choose AT4 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac Escalade 2018 6.2L Standard

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Infiniti | Infiniti QX80 2020 5.6L Luxe (8 Seats)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Infiniti | Infiniti QX80 2019 5.6L Luxe (8 Seats)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Infiniti | Infiniti QX80 2018 5.6L Luxe (8 Seats)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

GMC | AT4

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data, while AT4 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110, while AT4 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive, while AT4 uses No data.