ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
3998 mm
1,892
1765 mm
1,672–1,680
1645 mm
2,730
2521 mm
/
346 L
Fuel Economy
9–10
16.4 Km/L
59
52 L
/
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9 speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.6 L
1.5 L
170 BHP - 301 BHP
120 BHP
8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
252 hp
120 BHP
433 N·m
151 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 2.0L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
EcoSport 1.5 Trend
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickELEVATION AWD 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about price; choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive.