ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
4440 mm
1,892
1833 mm
1,672–1,680
1560 mm
2,730
2700 mm
/
330 L
Fuel Economy
9–10
13.5 Km/L
59
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9 speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1490 L
/
170 BHP - 252 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
252 hp
130 BHP
433 N·m
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 2.0L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, GS Sport 1.8L Classic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.