CarteaCompare CarsELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

170 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

17"

/

4,597

4695 mm

1,892

1800 mm

1,672–1,680

1710 mm

2,730

2670 mm

/

463 L

Fuel Economy

9–10

62.5 Km/L

59

43 L

/

62.5 Km/L

Comfort

HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Safety

forward

/

BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST

/

/

/

Infotainment

15"

/

/

/

Transmission

9 speed AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

MacPherson-strut

/

Four-link independent

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 3.6 L

2.4 L

170 BHP - 301 BHP

236 BHP

8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

2.4 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

Turbocharge

/

/

252 hp

236 BHP

433 N·m

300 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

    • Rear Camera
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
  • Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickELEVATION AWD 2.0L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

GMC | ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

GMC | ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

GMC | ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

GMC | ELEVATION AWD 2.0L

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a fuel consumption of 1.6. Therefore, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline uses All Wheel Drive.