ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
4175 mm
1,892
1775 mm
1,672–1,680
1610 mm
2,730
2500 mm
/
375 L
Fuel Economy
9–10
17.2 Km/L
59
47 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9 speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.6 L
1.6 L - 1586 L
170 BHP - 301 BHP
115 BHP
8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
252 hp
115 BHP
433 N·m
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 2.0L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickELEVATION AWD 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.