ELEVATION AWD 1.5L vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
4490 mm
1,892
1874 mm
1,672–1,680
1613 mm
2,730
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
9–10
/
59
/
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
8 speed AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.6 L
/
170 BHP - 301 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
/
Gasoline
Electric
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
175 hp
153 BHP
275 N·m
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 1.5L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 1.5L if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 1.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.