EQA 350 4MATIC vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

6.0

/

4,463

/

1,834

/

1,624

/

2,729

/

430-440 km

≥500

66.5

99

17-18 kWh/100 km

/

/

160+245

Engine / Motor

160

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

2,110

/

/

5 Doors

/

5209 mm

/

2010 mm

/

1713 mm

/

3110 mm

/

438 L

/

200 m

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

190 - 300 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed automatic

Automatic

Electric

Electric

350 km - 395 km

320 km - 515 km

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Electric

288

429 BHP

215

/

520

300+450

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQA 350 4MATIC

    • EHS9 Executive

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEQA 350 4MATIC

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose EQA 350 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2023 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q5 2024 45 TFSI quattro Sport

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2021 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2020 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, EQA 350 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 1,834, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, EQA 350 4MATIC has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 350 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.