EQA 350 4MATIC vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
/
/
6
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2,110
/
/
✓
/
5.145
/
1.980
/
1.890
/
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.4
/
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
/
190 - 300 BHP
240 BHP - 409
Automatic & Single-speed automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
350 km - 395 km
/
5 - 5
7 - 8 Seater
/
3.3 L - 5.7 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Petrol
288
271 BHP
215
/
520
385
/
4.0 L
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQA 350 4MATIC
Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Runflat Tyres
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQA 350 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQA 350 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 1,834, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQA 350 4MATIC has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 350 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR uses All Wheel Drive.