CarteaCompare CarsEQA 350 4MATIC vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

EQA 350 4MATIC vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

6.0

7.8

4,463

/

1,834

/

1,624

/

2,729

/

430-440 km

/

66.5

/

17-18 kWh/100 km

/

Engine / Motor

160

/

/

6

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

2,110

/

/

5035

/

1989

/

1778

/

3008

Fuel Economy

/

9.2

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

190 - 300 BHP

252 - 337

Automatic & Single-speed automatic

8-speed Automatic (8AT) & 8AT & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

350 km - 395 km

/

5 - 5

5 Seater - 7

/

2.0 L - 3.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

288

337 BHP

215

/

520

445

/

3.0 L

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQA 350 4MATIC

    • Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Runflat Tyres
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Collision Detection
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Spare Wheel
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickHongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose EQA 350 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2023 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q5 2024 45 TFSI quattro Sport

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2021 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2020 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, EQA 350 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 1,834, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, EQA 350 4MATIC has a wheelbase of No data, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3008. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 350 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.