EQA 350 4MATIC vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison

Car Information

6.0

8.2

4,463

/

1,834

/

1,624

/

2,729

/

430-440 km

443

66.5

76.1

17-18 kWh/100 km

/

Engine / Motor

160

190

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7

2,110

/

/

5009

/

1979

/

1750

/

3099

/

572

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

E-SHIFT (SBW)

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

190 - 300 BHP

215 - 380

Automatic & Single-speed automatic

Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)

Electric

Electric

350 km - 395 km

TBD

5 - 5

6 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Electric

288

215 BHP

215

/

520

350

/

SINGLE

/

SINGLE

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQA 350 4MATIC

    • EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Push Button Start
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose EQA 350 4MATIC if you care more about overall equipment; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2023 4.0L GXR

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q5 2024 45 TFSI quattro Sport

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2021 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | EQA 350 4MATIC

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2020 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, EQA 350 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 1,834, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, EQA 350 4MATIC has a wheelbase of No data, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 350 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.