AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

3.5

/

/

/

470 – 520

≥500

90.6 kWh

99

20-23 kWh/100km

/

/

160+245

Engine / Motor

220

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4,946

5209 mm

1,906

2010 mm

1,503

1713 mm

3,120

3110 mm

/

5 Doors

/

438 L

/

200 m

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

TBD

241 BHP - 617

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Automatic

Electric

Electric

425 km - 525 km

320 km - 515 km

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

Engine

/

/

Electric

Electric

617

429 BHP

950

300+450

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    • EHS9 Executive

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickEHS9 Executive

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Deluxe (6 Seats)

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    VS

    Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Deluxe (6 Seats)

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    VS

    BMW | X6 xDriveM50i

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

    VS

    Lexus | LX600 Prestige 3.5L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.