AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ vs X6 xDriveM50i Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
250 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,946
4935 mm
1,906
2212 mm
1,503
1696 mm
3,120
2975 mm
/
580 L
Fuel Economy
/
8.3 Km/L
/
83 L
/
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
241 BHP - 617
306 BHP - 530 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
425 km - 525 km
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
3.0 L - 4.4 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
4.4 L
Electric
Gasoline
617
530 BHP
950
750 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
X6 xDriveM50i
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design
- Powerful motor performance and precise control
- Luxurious interior materials and advanced technologies
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- High fuel consumption
- Limited backspace and storage
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAMG EQE 53 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose X6 xDriveM50i if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while X6 xDriveM50i has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while X6 xDriveM50i has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while X6 xDriveM50i uses All Wheel Drive.