EQM5 T3 Edition vs Jetta 2.0 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5040 mm
4659 mm
1910 mm
1778 mm
1569 mm
1482 mm
2990 mm
2651 mm
433 L
510 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.1 Km/L
/
55 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
134 BHP
115 BHP - 170 BHP
DHT
7 Speed DSG Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5
5 - 5
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
134 BHP
115 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Jetta 2.0 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickJetta 2.0 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Jetta 2.0 S if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data, while Jetta 2.0 S has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm, while Jetta 2.0 S has a wheelbase of 2651 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jetta 2.0 S uses Front Wheel Drive.