EQS 450+ vs GLS 450 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
250 km/h
/
6
/
2999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4,946
5207 mm
2,103
2030 mm
1,503
1850 mm
3,120
3135 mm
/
5 Doors
/
493 L
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
/
8 Km/L
/
90 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
335 hp - 525 BHP
375 BHP - 550 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
525 km - 595 km
/
5 - 5
5 - 7
/
3.0 L - 4.7 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
3.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
335 hp
375 BHP
245-265 kW
275
568-565
500 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450+
GLS 450 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
- Remote key types
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLS 450 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450+ if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLS 450 4MATIC if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while GLS 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while GLS 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3135 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLS 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450+ uses Rear Drive, while GLS 450 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.