EQS 450+ vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
305 km/h
/
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
4,946
5123 mm
2,103
2022 mm
1,503
1638 mm
3,120
3003 mm
/
5 Doors
/
617 L
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
/
7 Km/L
/
75 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
335 hp - 525 BHP
650 BHP - 800 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
525 km - 595 km
/
5 - 5
4 Seater
/
4.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
335 hp
666 BHP
245-265 kW
/
568-565
850 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450+
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 450+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450+ if you care more about price; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450+ has a wheelbase of 3,120, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450+ uses Rear Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.