CarteaCompare CarsEQS 450 SUV 4MATIC vs BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive

EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC vs BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive Comparison

Car Information

6.0

3.8

600-640 km

107.8

/

20.5 kWh/100 km

/

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

250

GCC

/

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

2,805

/

5 Doors

/

5125 mm

4.941

2157 mm

2.019

1718 mm

1.693

3210 mm

2.933

645 L

580

/

Fuel Economy

/

9.0

/

85

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Single-speed automatic

Automatic

/

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

357 BHP - 650

555 BHP - 617 BHP

1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

485 km - 700 km

/

5 - 7 Seater

5 Seater

/

4.4 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Petrol

360 BHP

617 BHP

265

/

800 Nm

750

/

4.4 L

Motor

10

/

options.Lithium-ion

/

265 kW

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types
  • BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent power performance and control
  • Unique and attractive exterior design
  • A luxurious interior, equipped with technology

Negative

  • High fuel consumption and high maintenance costs
  • Driving comfort is less due to stiff suspension
  • High purchase price

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2022 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2021 Turbo

Mercedes Benz | EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

VS

BMW | BMW X6 2022 xDriveM50i

Mercedes Benz | EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

VS

BMW | BMW X6 2021 xDriveM50i

Mercedes Benz | EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC

VS

BMW | BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm, while BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2.933. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while BMW X6M 2024 Competition 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.