EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC vs DBX 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
291 km/h
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2,805
/
5 Doors
/
5125 mm
5039 mm
2157 mm
2050 mm
1718 mm
1680 mm
3210 mm
3060 mm
645 L
632 L
Fuel Economy
/
7 Km/L
/
85 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
357 BHP - 650
542 BHP - 707 BHP
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
485 km - 700 km
/
5 - 7 Seater
5 Seater
/
4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
360 BHP
542 BHP
265
/
800 Nm
700 Nm
/
4.0 L
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
DBX 4.0T V8
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDBX 4.0T V8
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose DBX 4.0T V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while DBX 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm, while DBX 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3060 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while DBX 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.