EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC vs Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
250
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
2,805
2,700
5 Doors
/
5125 mm
5,207
2157 mm
1,956
1718 mm
1,823
3210 mm
3,135
645 L
/
Fuel Economy
/
10
/
90
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
9-speed automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
357 BHP - 650
612
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
9-speed automatic
Electric
Gasoline
485 km - 700 km
/
5 - 7 Seater
7
/
4.0L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
360 BHP
612
265
450
800 Nm
850
/
V
/
4.0L
/
/
/
twin-turbo
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about price; choose Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3,135. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLS 63 4MATIC+ uses Four-Wheel Drive.