EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC vs Raize 1.0T Limited Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2,805
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5125 mm
4030 mm
2157 mm
1710 mm
1718 mm
1635 mm
3210 mm
2525 mm
645 L
369 L
Fuel Economy
/
19.2 Km/L
/
36 L
/
19.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
360 BHP
97 BHP
265
/
800 Nm
140 Nm
/
1.0 L
Motor
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
/
Key Spec
/
1.0 L - 1.2 L
/
87 - 97
/
Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Raize 1.0T Limited
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRaize 1.0T Limited
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Raize 1.0T Limited if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while Raize 1.0T Limited has a fuel consumption of 5.21. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm, while Raize 1.0T Limited has a wheelbase of 2525 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Raize 1.0T Limited uses Front Wheel Drive.