EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs GLE 63 Premium+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
250 km/h
GCC
GCC
/
8
/
3999 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4946 mm
4924 mm
2103 mm
1948 mm
1503 mm
1796 mm
3120 mm
2995 mm
430 L
655 L
/
198 m
Fuel Economy
/
9 Km/L
/
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
760 BHP
367 BHP - 625 hp
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
9-speed automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
540 km
/
5 Seater
5 - 5
/
3.0 L - 4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
760 BHP
603 BHP
560 kW
/
1020 Nm
850 Nm
/
V
/
4.0 L
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
GLE 63 Premium+
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose GLE 63 Premium+ if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while GLE 63 Premium+ has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while GLE 63 Premium+ has a wheelbase of 2995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while GLE 63 Premium+ uses All Wheel Drive.