CarteaCompare CarsEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ Comparison

Car Information

3.4

/

526-586

/

107.8 kWh

/

21.5-23.9 kWh/100 km

/

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

280 km/h

GCC

European

/

8

/

3998 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4946 mm

4,954 mm

2103 mm

1,947 mm

1503 mm

1,782 mm

3120 mm

2,995 mm

430 L

500 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

/

12.5

/

85 L

/

6.8 Km/L

Comfort

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Digital

Digital

None

Electric

Bucket

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

Android LCD

14

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Single-speed Automatic

9-speed automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

760 BHP

367 BHP - 625 hp

Automatic & Single-speed Automatic

9-speed automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

540 km

/

5 Seater

5 - 5

/

3.0 L - 4.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Hybrid

760 BHP

625 hp

560 kW

/

1020 Nm

850 Nm

/

V

/

4.0 L

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Motor

9

/

options.Lithium-ion

/

560 kW

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

    • Remote key types
  • Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQS 580 4MATIC

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | G 500 Premium+

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Toyota | Raize XLE

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2,995 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.