EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
305 km/h
GCC
/
/
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4946 mm
5123 mm
2103 mm
2022 mm
1503 mm
1638 mm
3120 mm
3003 mm
430 L
617 L
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
/
7 Km/L
/
75 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
4-Zone
✓
Electric
✓
Bucket
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
10.1
✓
Android LCD
✓
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
760 BHP
650 BHP - 800 BHP
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
540 km
/
5 Seater
4 Seater
/
4.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
760 BHP
666 BHP
560 kW
/
1020 Nm
850 Nm
/
V
/
4.0 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about price; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.