CarteaCompare CarsEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive

EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ vs X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive Comparison

Car Information

3.4

/

526-586

/

107.8 kWh

/

21.5-23.9 kWh/100 km

/

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

250 km/h

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4946 mm

4941 mm

2103 mm

2019 mm

1503 mm

1693 mm

3120 mm

2933 mm

430 L

580 L

Fuel Economy

/

9 Km/L

/

85 L

/

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

Single-speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

760 BHP

555 BHP - 617 BHP

Automatic & Single-speed Automatic

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

540 km

/

5 Seater

5 Seater

/

4.4 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

760 BHP

617 BHP

560 kW

/

1020 Nm

750 Nm

/

4.4 L

Motor

9

/

options.Lithium-ion

/

560 kW

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

    • Remote key types
  • X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Excellent power performance and control
  • Unique and attractive exterior design
  • A luxurious interior, equipped with technology

Negative

  • High fuel consumption and high maintenance costs
  • Driving comfort is less due to stiff suspension
  • High purchase price

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX6M Competition 4.4T xDrive

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQS 580 4MATIC

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Cadillac | Escalade V-Series

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC+

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Mercedes Benz | G 500 Premium+

Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

VS

Toyota | Raize XLE

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2933 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.