EREV AWD vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,825
4490 mm
1,980
1874 mm
1,620
1613 mm
2,940
2750 mm
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
/
310 - 590
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
TBD
Electric & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.5 L
/
Hybrid
Electric
485
305 BHP
1,152
/
629
680 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EREV AWD
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EREV AWD if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EREV AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EREV AWD has a wheelbase of 2,940, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EREV AWD uses No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.