ES5 2025 425 Pro vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
170
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1615
/
4476
4.314
1849
1.809
1621
1.624
2050
/
462-1423
448
4.99
/
/
✓
/
2.585
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
0.43h
/
8.5h
/
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson Strut
/
Multi-link Independent Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
170 BHP
112 BHP - 168
DHT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
1.3 L - 1.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5 L
Electric
Petrol
170 BHP
112 BHP
✓
/
/
150
Motor
250
/
1
/
6.6kW
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
Rear
/
Technologies
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Individual, Comfort, ECO
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES5 2025 425 Pro
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES5 2025 425 Pro if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES5 2025 425 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES5 2025 425 Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES5 2025 425 Pro uses Rear Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.