ES90 vs Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
250
/
8
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2441
/
5000
4993
2120
1907
1549
1460
3102
2939
/
540
Fuel Economy
/
11.0
/
66
Transmission
DHT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
333 BHP
367 - 449
DHT
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
/
5
5
/
3.0 L - 3.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
333 BHP
612 BHP
/
4.0 L
/
850
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES90
Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES90 if you care more about interior space; choose Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES90 has a wheelbase of 3102, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2939. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES90 uses Rear Drive, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.