ES90 vs S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2441
/
5000
4761 mm
2120
1850 mm
1549
1431 mm
3102
2872 mm
/
391 L
Fuel Economy
/
15.6 Km/L
/
60 L
/
15.6 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
333 BHP
180 BHP - 360 BHP
DHT
Automatic & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
1.5 L - 3.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
333 BHP
197 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
300 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ES90
S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES90
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ES90 if you care more about price; choose S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ES90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN has a fuel consumption of 6.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ES90 has a wheelbase of 3102, while S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN has a wheelbase of 2872 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ES90 uses Rear Drive, while S60 2.0T B4 MHEV R DESIGN uses Front Wheel Drive.