CarteaCompare CarsET5 Long Range vs Stelvio Veloce

ET5 Long Range vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison

Car Information

550

/

100

/

Engine / Motor

/

230 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

2245

/

4 Doors

/

4790

4680 mm

1960

2160 mm

1499

1670 mm

2888 mm

2818 mm

options. L

525 L

options. mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

11.2 Km/L

/

64 L

/

11.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Premium Nappa leather seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

320 BHP

280 BHP - 510 BHP

AT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

2.0 L - 2.9 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

320 BHP

280 BHP

550 Nm

400 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ET5 Long Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Stelvio Veloce

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Futuristic and distinctive exterior design
  • Advanced technological configuration
  • Exceptional driving performance and dynamics

Negative

  • Higher pricing
  • Incomplete after-sales service network
  • Areas for improvement in detail craftsmanship

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickET5 Long Range

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ET5 Long Range if you care more about price; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | ET5 Long Range

VS

Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan

Nio | ET5 Long Range

VS

Alfa Romeo | Stelvio Veloce

Nio | ET5 Long Range

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2023 Veloce

Nio | ET5 Long Range

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2024 Veloce

Nio | ET5 Long Range

VS

Audi | Audi A6 2023 40 TFSI (190 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ET5 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ET5 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET5 Long Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ET5 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.