CarteaCompare CarsET9 100kwh vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

ET9 100kwh vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison

Car Information

4.3

/

16.2

/

Engine / Motor

/

161 km/h

Dimensions

4

5 Seater

5325

4341 mm

2017

1804 mm

1621

1693 mm

3250

2676 mm

/

16

/

414 L

Fuel Economy

/

17.2 Km/L

/

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

/

/

/

Infotainment

35

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

255/45 R22

/

255/45 R22

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

707 BHP

105 BHP - 135 BHP

AT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

4

5 - 5

/

1.6 L - 2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

707 BHP

115 BHP

/

1.6 L

/

156 Nm

Motor

700

/

/

2

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ET9 100kwh

    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickET9 100kwh

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ET9 100kwh if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Nio | ET9 100kwh

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ET9 100kwh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ET9 100kwh has a wheelbase of 3250, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET9 100kwh, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ET9 100kwh uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.