ET9 100kwh vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
5325
4490 mm
2017
1874 mm
1621
1613 mm
3250
2750 mm
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
35
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
255/45 R22
/
255/45 R22
/
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
707 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
AT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
4
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
707 BHP
305 BHP
/
680 Nm
Motor
700
/
✓
/
2
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ET9 100kwh
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ET9 100kwh if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ET9 100kwh has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ET9 100kwh has a wheelbase of 3250, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET9 100kwh, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ET9 100kwh uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.