EX90 vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
5037
4490 mm
1964
1874 mm
1747
1613 mm
2985
2750 mm
1675
/
1666
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
517 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
DHT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
6
5 Seater
Engine
Electric
Electric
517 BHP
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Motor
2
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX90
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX90 if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX90 has a wheelbase of 2985, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX90 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.