EX90 vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
205 km/h
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
5037
4855 mm
1964
1860 mm
1747
1465 mm
2985
2805 mm
1675
/
1666
/
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.8 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
517 BHP
157 BHP - 265 BHP
DHT
AT & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
6
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
517 BHP
240 BHP
/
2.0 L
/
350 Nm
Motor
2
/
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX90
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX90 if you care more about interior space; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX90 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX90 has a wheelbase of 2985, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX90 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.