Expedition Active 4X2 2025 vs Mustang Mach-E GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
5
5636
4712
2029
1881
1941
1597
3343
2984
592
100+402
/
20
Fuel Economy
10.3
/
107
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8
10.2
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
370
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
15.5
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
B&O
Battery/Charging
/
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
Transmission
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
/
✓
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.4 L
/
300 BHP - 440
255 BHP - 487
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
6 Seater - 8
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
كهربائي
Engine
3.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
400
487
650
950
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
Comparison of configuration highlights
Expedition Active 4X2 2025
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Mustang Mach-E GT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Expedition Active 4X2 2025 if you care more about price; choose Mustang Mach-E GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71, while Mustang Mach-E GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Expedition Active 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343, while Mustang Mach-E GT has a wheelbase of 2984. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active 4X2 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Expedition Active 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive, while Mustang Mach-E GT uses Four-Wheel Drive.