Forthing V3 vs DFSK C35 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
140
/
1499
Dimensions
Sliding Door
/
/
2
14"
14"
4500
4500
1710
1680
2000
1985
2850
3050
/
800
Fuel Economy
14
15.5
55
55L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
5MT
5MT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Drive
MacPherson
Macpherson independent suspension
Leaf Spring
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
Key Spec
1.5
1.5
125
114
5MT
5MT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
TBD
2
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
125
114
150
148
/
Naturally Aspirated
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Forthing V3
- Parking sensor rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDFSK C35 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Forthing V3 if you care more about power; choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Forthing V3 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Forthing V3 has a wheelbase of 2850, while DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Forthing V3 uses Front Drive, while DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive.