G580 EQ vs EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
250 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4863
4946 mm
2187
2103 mm
1986
1503 mm
/
4 Doors
/
3120 mm
/
430 L
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
/
330 - 585 BHP
760 BHP
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic & Single-speed Automatic
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
540 km
Engine
Electric
Electric
579
760 BHP
432
/
1,164
1020 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
560 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
G580 EQ
EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose G580 EQ if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, G580 EQ has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, G580 EQ has a wheelbase of No data, while EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 3120 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G580 EQ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.