CarteaCompare CarsG580 EQ vs ET BEV

G580 EQ vs ET BEV Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

470–473 km

410km

116 kWh

77kwh

24-25 kWh/100 km

19.8 kWh/100km

Engine / Motor

180

/

Dimensions

5

5

4863

4980

2187

1975

1986

1694

/

21"

/

3000

Fuel Economy

/

19.8 kWh/100km

Comfort

/

/

NFC

/

/

4-direction electric

Interior

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

front seats

Infotainment

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

23

Battery/Charging

/

10 min/ 20-80%

Transmission

2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear)

AT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

✓ + CDC

Key Spec

2.9 L - 4.0 L

TBD

330 - 585 BHP

473HP

2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic

AT

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Engine

Electric

Electric

579

473HP

432

353kw

1,164

660Nm

/

/

/

/

Exterior

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

2

Technologies

/

L2 ADAS

/

Front & Rear

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • G580 EQ

    • ET BEV

      • Power Tailgate
      • Keyless Entry
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Driving Recorder
      • Intelligent Emergency Call
      • Knee Bag - Driver
      • Crash Auto Door Unlock
      • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
      • Child Lock
      • Seat belt reminder

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickET BEV

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose G580 EQ if you care more about overall equipment; choose ET BEV if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | G580 EQ

    VS

    Land Rover | Land Rover Range Rover 2024 5.0L V8 Autobiography (525 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | G580 EQ

    VS

    Porsche | Cayenne Coupe Turbo GT

    Mercedes Benz | G580 EQ

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2023 Turbo GT

    Mercedes Benz | G580 EQ

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+

    Mercedes Benz | G580 EQ

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | EQS 580 4MATIC

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, G580 EQ has a fuel consumption of No data, while ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, G580 EQ has a wheelbase of No data, while ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. G580 EQ uses Four-Wheel Drive, while ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive.