GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh vs Altima 2.5 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
Chinese
/
/
220 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4810 mm
4869 mm
1880 mm
1850 mm
1545 mm
1440 mm
2750 mm
2825 mm
/
517 L
Fuel Economy
/
15.9 Km/L
/
61.3 L
/
15.9 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Independent Suspension
/
Torsion-beam Suspension
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
134BHP
179 BHP - 270 BHP
single-speed automatic
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
Electric
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
2.5 L
Electric
Gasoline
134BHP
188 BHP
225 Nm
244 Nm
Motor
8.5
/
Lithium-Ion
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh
Altima 2.5 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh if you care more about price; choose Altima 2.5 S if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Altima 2.5 S has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Altima 2.5 S has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Altima 2.5 S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh uses Front Wheel Drive , while Altima 2.5 S uses Front Wheel Drive.