GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh vs Elantra 1.6L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
Chinese
/
/
209 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4810 mm
4675 mm
1880 mm
1825 mm
1545 mm
1430 mm
2750 mm
2720 mm
/
474 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.9 Km/L
/
50 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
single-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Independent Suspension
/
Torsion-beam Suspension
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
134BHP
103 - 159 BHP
single-speed automatic
Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
134BHP
127 BHP
225 Nm
157 Nm
Motor
8.5
/
Lithium-Ion
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh
Elantra 1.6L Comfort
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Related comparisons
Editor's PickElantra 1.6L Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh if you care more about interior space; choose Elantra 1.6L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a fuel consumption of No data, while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Elantra 1.6L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC Aion ES Std 55.2kWh uses Front Wheel Drive , while Elantra 1.6L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.