GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

210

4

4

1999 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4680 mm

4549

1901 mm

1860

1670 mm

1689

2750 mm

2734

450 L

/

160 mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

14.9

55 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Multi-Link Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

140 BHP - 177

216 BHP

Automatic & DCT & DHT

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

None

/

4

/

138 BHP

216 BHP

180 Nm

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL if you care more about price; choose Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2022 S 2WD (7-Seater)

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2022 SV X-Treamer AWD (7-Seater)

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL

GAC | GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL

VS

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2019 2.4L Longitude (4x4)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a fuel consumption of No data, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GAC EMKOO 2.0L GL uses Front Wheel Drive , while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.